Thinking whilst all there isn't

I was reading on Stiegler, I found some Hans Sluga, then John Dupre's Metaphysics of Biology. I gotten distance from what I had set on... and how? Idiot systems for living in the State, comedians sarcasm regurgitated as truth, the usual Britain: infection (every sense) by and of stupidity. I'm not anti-woke, I think Judith Butler gets stuff wrong, so to Sara Ahmed. And when Avital Ronnel is cited as succesful communucation by jargon... I tire.
Males, those at least shaped to being man or boy, learn to be distrustful of praise, of settling for the only different, or extension of old, idea. Honestly. Somehow those in the Critical zone, maybe often women, don't want to distrust?
I remember this was tumbling in my thoughts.
So I'd taken a look at Hobbes (the early and late as presented in a book from 1930 - when, the remark has no guidance to parsing except it may be a judgement on pre-new deal US) and Luhmann before Stiegler jumped up.

Differance. I continue to assert that we do not communicate in any way that fixes a meaning or even a memory of the so-called communication. Differance is that not communicated and, moreover it is all that is excluded, that we hold as a seperation of words or images in a frame with our experienced moment of being communicated to. Differance is that happening because what was there in communication to happen didn't do so.

I don't know. Something stops some of us from thinking differance to the order of things. Instead substance is given to so-called communication which is not that transfer of set information. It is only what is entirely communication, as an exclusion of making differance.

It is, I'm guessing, Butler's perfomativity, Ahmed's abjectionism, Ronnel's suite of neologisms. The expectation of knowing that is not knowing how. Knowing how is(/not) any thing. By taking up differance as an approach (this is of my 4th Wall weapon, though, of course, I don't know even all that...) instead of going through the motions, believing everythings about communication, may be what's missing?

Something is, and Badiou-ing it up is decidedly, objectionably, the wrong way into a judgementally.

This is not a polemic. Only a distribution noted in a process merely theorised.