Have Never Been 2

https://youtu.be/si9iG-093aY

My passing (though it would not pass) attention to Hobbes (albeit I had planned a character for a fiction, for a tv project (the avengers/prisoner with a killer House, I never watched Dexter...)) was started up by this lecture.
I had read essays in German Law Journal on Foucault/Derrida regarding the Sovereign, though I've not gotten to read their works so far. What arrived to me on reading Hobbes - a comparative edition of his works, condensed Leviathan, at this point - was that we should skip Hume as the catalyst to Kant and consider Hobbes, consider Leviathan to be exact.

Latour went on in 2004 to push the thesis of WHNBM, I tried to read it. Then more recently dabbling in an Art project, it looked very sad. In W..M Latour is that newspaper reader, survivor no less, of La Chute. I'd guess FAZ, Liberatione and The Guardian. That is to say I think he his, then, unexceptionally isolated from day-to-day people and the exceptional, the artists. Before I forget, he believes that Kant failed. Supposedly we are engaged in deconstruction of a mere spectre.

Further Latour writes like some pastiche fiction - Henry Fielding does, so don't knock it with the wrong idea - and this kind of automation is exactly what I am attempting to use the term representation for. It exists metaphorically for one, without content, yet hits on itself through art. And we can't get it to a verbalisation, it's not around for psychoanalysis, it simply shapes and I don't know that you should care for what I may add to its description. Though I will be on it.

The best I can do this moment is repeat something, with addition, and evade Latour's feathery boas.

Animals domesticate us. That is resented, we see them as ritualising and, this is something of representing in one dimension (maybe the juvenile?), try that *against* all things animal, against also our own domestication. I mention the juvenile (and mindful I have presented the jesuits already) to suggest that - a philosopher called Fraser brought sunk cost into consideration today - the entire mechanism that permits militarisation is a product of the ritualised processing - quite knowing yet stupified by reifications - of young persons. That cost, against the risks and benefits against militarisation, is ignored. If anything accounts for growing failure against the boots of tech giants, it's there?
The claim I'm constructing is that of how we drop out of modernity - what is better than this as an alternative to "civilisation"? - by losing something of arts. Quite so, IQ is not the first medium of collation to have guided in principle.

Usual apologies. Yes, I could pick out verbatum from Latour. That's for you to do if need be. It's like reading the grease splashes in a chip-shop. I don't write up my actual notes here, I ad-hoc a version certainly less with logics I employ.