Indicators

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/715184?s=09

The above is a new paper of a sort aspired to in analytic philosophy now. I haven't read through it, only the thread of tweets appended to the posting tweet.

I don't entirely get why philosophy allows this stuff under it's title. It doesn't draw from life at all so much as it does technology. Philotechny?

No matter. I'm interested in questioning, along the same lines, if memory is triggered, if it triggers. This is the zone.
I'm beginning to think that memory only indicates a process has become operational by deeper somatic switches.
The advantage of this, to be tested for, is can/do memories replace memories for the same processes (how much a process is without its own changes is not be precluded though is another level of detection) because this would be as much as introspection is. And that would say a lot about how we do learn though it is the luck of process triggers over which we may have no conscious control.
Philosophically this remains a prioritisation of individual operation due to unique memory kernel (that would be epigenetic). However philosophically I am only marking out my position against Hobbesian (Cartesian, too), Humean incompletion and thereby Kant onward through phenomenology. I've a lot to do to get out of the pull of phenomenology as, ironically, remembering every schema and the veridical taxonomy is tough.