Under Pressure

The percentages, the staple of decision-makers in the media's gaze. The majority of people who would be picked as jewish under the aryan law of Hitler's regime if it were introduced would be surprised. No less if a similarly law was repurposed for deportation to Israel, using very unreliable genetic database analysis, the majority would be surprised. Those who insist they are of jewish lineage may, by this measure, find themselves ejected from Israel. On and on it goes, if reification of racism develops further.

In our democracies we defer to the majority often without further debate, without admitting that the actual majority often makes that majority a minority. Some that voted Brexit do not simply regret the actuality, they believe they were uninformed of the projected consequences of a Brexit. Considering that few can be  broadly educated in every information dependent decision we should, informed by the certain probability of "unforeseen" consequences making a minority - of the majority additional to the minority that already forms a greater majority than the token majority - regret their decision, we should use any such decision to commit to further debate until social effects, the necessity of negative liberty - the right to be unimpeded in pursuit of private existence that does not impose on other private lives - outweighs the authority of decision makers by vote or "public opinion".
This would be what a petitioners' democracy by my design would achieve. It is a retrofit of Habeas Corpus. That Parliamentary Democracy exceeds this progressive practical direction toward social solidarity evolving from deconstruction of authority's power supposedly selected by democracy (which only derives from allegiances forced into formation under threat of destruction of the State that legitimated their honourific power in public life) though in practice little more than partially codified conventions installed by arbitrary decisions under pressure.

Returning to the issue of theology as biologically inherited, or one of it's by-products, Israel. There is no way out of conflict resolving such a cosmogonic competition except by agreeing it is certainly very questionably premised. None of the media featured contenders for parliamentary, or otherwise, seats breaks away from the prejudicial, albeit argued as conferring "recognition", perpetuation of certain segregations to further establish a dependence on parliamentary absolution to absorb constructed tribal divisions that are variously expelled for treatment, generally of legal contradiction and circuitious means to the end that begins the same.
Godlike Democracy, dividing for conquest by immanent nationalisms, is unbelievable.